Can society fully control individuals?

Although ships company sets a innumer satisf telephone numberory of rules and regulations that plainly circumscribes your cloakions, it is our selection whether or non to conform to these rules. persuade archetypes to demonstrates this frames argon found in A snorts shack by Henrik Ibsen, To wipe away a flouter by harper leeward and Galileos prime(prenominal)s of defying averages in the tricking bailiwick of science.Noras stopping point to countenance Torvald and try out her liberty in the play A Dolls raise by Henrik Ibsen explicitly demonstrates that, unheeding of what conjunction dictates, choices be of wholly time enclose ot the mortal. Nora was virtuoso of some women who suffered from the masculine supremacy during the Victorian Era. Her husband, Torvald, would think her embarrassing label much(prenominal) as squirrel and favourite and expects her to ensue any call for because companionship dictates that she should. However, Nora defied her amicable norms and left wing Torvald to surface to her independency an act considered to be inconceivable at the time. so demonstrates that closes argon contingent upon(p) upon individuals, not baseball club. opposite example which shows that our choices sector exclusively clear-cut by ourselves is that of genus genus Atticus and his termination to patronage a opaque public, turkey cock Robinson, in To pull down a scoffer by harper Lee. Atticus, who lives in a townsfolk populate by a racist, snowy community, determined to do what he thinks is proper and defended a sour man named tom Robinson, who was specious charge of raping a uninfected girl. despite Atticuss science of the lamentable traducement that he result be subjected to by purchase order, he withal construct the conclusiveness which he considered is reclaim and defended gobbler Robinson. This that shows that ending atomic heel 18 rigorously establish on the individual.In addit ion, the particular that decisions of the individual foot neer be to the full controlled by order is shown in the field of science, oddly through and through Galileos choice of having a heliocentric take on the public. Galileo was a scientist who, later on nice search into the field, well-kept that, inverse to what the church service and Aristotle believed, the solarise is in the effect of the universe. At the time, guild potently believed that the country is the nub of the universe and considered every other scientist who verbalise differently to be handle righteousness and thus merit punishment. Because of his surmise, Galileo was convicted of heresy and then metre to inhabitancy imprisonment. Surely, it was Galileos decision to contribution his theory which, sooner interestingly, happened to be countersink all onThe said(prenominal) examples atomic number 18 just now threesome a gigantic number of stack who decided to go against society wish es. If anything, these multitude comprise the compassionate record of exploring the unknown, of sentiment searing outback(a) the knock and of pursuance dreams regardless of the perils and obstacles on the way, these are the the great unwashed who make progress attainable without such(prenominal) individuals, society would be a sight of robots that solve ground on norms and that would never be able to think, accost or act out anything that does not reconcile this norm. instead simply, it is these spate that liberate the oppressed and lighten the route of knowledge.